Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Falsehood as Lawfare: The Dangerous Weaponization of Rumors Against Duterte’s Sovereign Anti-Drug Crusade

 By Atty. Arnedo S. Valera I. INTRODUCTION: A TRIAL BY TSISMIS The recent public remarks by Atty. Kristina Conti—suggesting that former President Rodrigo Duterte and his family amassed untold billions from drug lords—represent a serious breach not only of ethical standards in legal advocacy but also of truth and sovereignty. These are  grave, defamatory allegations  unsupported by admissible evidence and  tantamount to reckless endangerment of public discourse . In a rule-of-law society,  accusations of criminality must be proven in court , not speculated on in media soundbites. When a self-proclaimed “human rights lawyer” peddles  unverified tsismis (gossip)  as fact, and when such gossip is used to justify international prosecution, it is not justice—it is lawfare: the political weaponization of law to destroy reputations, undermine sovereignty, and manipulate public perception. II. THE LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK OF THE WAR ON DRUGS A. A Legitimate N...

Latest Posts

The Right to Move for Dismissal: Why the Senate Sitting as an Impeachment Court Can Dismiss a Politically Motivated Complaint

Audit All, Impeach None: Ending Hypocrisy in the Pursuit of Accountability

Duterte’s Bid for Transfer to a Third Country: A Legal Analysis

Is the Senate Superior to the House in Impeachment? Not Quite. But It Can Remand Articles of Impeachment.

Broken Gavel, Broken Democracy: The Sinister Plot to Impeach VP Sara and Derail the Will of the Filipino People

Remand, Not Rubber Stamp: Why Senator Sotto’s Impeachment Commentary Misses the Constitutional Mark